Skip to content

Sustainable golf courses

February 8, 2010

In light of the upcoming HSBC Women’s Champions Golf tournament coming up in Singapore on the 25th-28th February, I thought I’d write a piece on golf courses. I’m not saying that golf courses contribute towards climate change or are significant drivers/indicators of hedonistic and material lifestyles but I truely believe that golf courses are a real waste of space. I say this, having read some papers on golf courses in Singapore and I know that there are some avid nature-lovers out there who share my sentiments about golf courses in tiny, “land-scarce” Singapore.

Private golf courses

So I’ll break it down for you. Very simply, golf courses need turf management and landscaping to say the least. They also take up vast amounts of land, require large amounts of water and fertilisers for maintenance and they only cater to a small number of elite members of society!

In recent years, there have been books such as Sustainable Golf Courses: A guide to environmental stewardship highlighting the need for accountability and environmental responsibility in the creation and tending of golf courses around the world. Golf courses are man-made landscapes and sometimes can lead to serious environmental problems like eutrophication (water pollution from too much fertiliser run-off) and land degradation from the absence of trees. In Singapore, golf courses serve a mere 2% of the population but take up significant amounts of land. Needless to say, these country-clubs and courses have costly memberships and usually are only accessible via cars (buried deep in estates or located next to highways).

Golf is quite an expensive sport but I’m not really the best judge of how well it caters to fitness and ranks as a leisure activity since I don’t play. But I just want to raise the level of awareness about golf courses and how much is at stake each time a new one is designated and built. In Singapore, it has happened at the expense of wetlands and public parks and reservoirs (MacRitchie/Bukit Timah). Public areas and vegetated land is rendered private and trespassers can be prosecuted for trangressing private, club property. So is it possible for golf courses to be sustainable?

I checked out some articles online for a “fairer” viewpoint and here’s one pretty good one. It articulates the concerns about U.S. golf courses.

Is There Such a Thing as Sustainable Golf?

Originally at

Posted by Paul Freibott on May 2, 2006 – 1:32pm.


Sustainable business practices are fairly new on the fairways, but the golf industry, after years of bad publicity, public pressure, and dedicated activism, is slowly and voluntarily changing its ways. Here’s the dope: first we’ll give you the bad news and then move on to all the reasons golfers should be hopeful.

The Bad News

Golf course in the U.S. in stark contrast to its surroundings!

Not to overstate the case, nearly everything bad you’ve heard about golf courses has some basis in the truth. In Scotland, where the sport was born, golfers have teed off for five centuries on mostly natural fairways that are scrappier and less altered than the highly manicured 18 holes common elsewhere. In contrast, natural or sustainable grounds maintenance is so new in the U.S. that less than a fifth of golf courses practice it. The irony is that modern golf courses arrived at their current state of unnatural beauty by attempting to reproduce the lush, verdant Scottish landscape in places that nature didn’t mean for Scotland to be—places like forests, wetlands, and deserts. This bizarre evolution caused excessive water use (sometimes potable water, to boot), reduction of wildlife habitat, and the introduction of non-native plant life that upset the local ecology and that require harsh pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers in order to flourish, further harming water quality.

“A golf course is still development,” says Eric Antebi, national spokesperson for the Sierra Club. “It is not part of the natural landscape.” He points out that many new golf courses are part of major building projects such as resorts and planned communities, and are advertised—erroneously—as environmental amenities and open spaces offering natural beauty. A golf course “should not be considered an open space,” he says, especially when it means sacrificing part of a forest. Currently, the Sierra Club hopes to “protect 17,000 threatened Monterey pine trees from being cut down for yet another golf course in Pebble Beach.”

The Good News

Ironically, some of the country’s earliest golf courses actually helped prevent worse sprawl later on. The Olympia Fields Country Club, for example, was built in 1915 just south of Chicago to offer relief from industrial urban life. In the mid-20th century, its existence meant that more density—buildings, streets and driveways—weren’t built, and today, it remains a rare green space in the area, regularly hosting bird-watchers who can ogle up to 95 different feathered species in between birdies. Many new courses are striving to do good, too. The Kabi Organic Golf Course & Orchard in Australia, is a great example of this trend. More and more golf course superintendents are using fewer pesticides and fertilizers (or none at all), regularly testing water quality, mowing less often and in fewer areas, composting grass clippings, and using reclaimed rainwater. Some greens now provide sanctuary for local wildlife and are replanted with native grasses that require less harmful care.

These simple changes can be drastically effective. Courses watered with effluent from wastewater treatment facilities, for example, which also maintain vegetative buffer zones, will actually help purify the processed wastewater of salts, nitrogen, and phosphorous before it enters waterways.

The Golf Course Superintendent Association of America, a trade group seeking to avoid government regulation, advocates voluntary changes such as these and runs peer education efforts through its Environmental Institute for Golf. In March, it began a yearlong survey that will help set goals and measure progress towards environmentally safer practices. Among nonprofit groups, Audubon International engages the golf industry directly and has been preaching its gospel of greener greens to owners, superintendents, and developers since 1991.

“We work with anyone who wants to move their businesses in a more sustainable direction,” says Joellen Zeh, programs manager for Audubon’s Cooperative Sanctuary Program. “Compared to strip malls and housing developments, golf courses are a lot more environmentally friendly.”

On average, Audubon-certified courses convert 22 acres of turf grass, out of roughly 120, back to natural habitat. The group currently works with a few thousand golf courses, and aims for 50 percent participation by the end of 2007. Cost-savings from using less water, chemicals, energy, and even grounds staff can be an incentive for courses to sign up.

Audubon has also partnered with the PGA to educate golfers themselves. At their Golf & the Environment website, golfers learn that small steps like properly replacing divots and repairing ball marks will help minimize the need for lawn maintenance. Most importantly, they’re encouraged to vocally support their own course’s superintendents’ green efforts.

The Verdict

It’s hard to argue with reducing toxins in our soil and water, no matter what industry—and at least some golf courses are trying. But are environmentally conscious golf courses really a boon for the planet? Or do they enable golf course developers to continue hogging valuable land? Antebi, of the Sierra Club, gets it about right. “Development is a fact of life,” he says, admitting that any lessening of golf’s environmental impact is better than none. “The question is, can you have smarter development? There are appropriate and inappropriate places to put roads and buildings—and there are good and bad places to put golf courses. Even the best-run golf course in an inappropriate place is a bad idea.” For further reading: Sustainable Golf Courses: A Guide to Environmental Stewardship (Hardcover available at Environmental Institute for Golf GCSAA’s Environmental Management Program Golf & the Environment Audubon International’s Cooperative Sanctuary Programs for Golf Courses Sierra Club Scottish Golf & the Environment#

Maybe it’s time we start to think about these issues here in Singapore. Think about it the next time you visit a golf course or tell some one who plays golf about it! There are ways to help make such landscapes more environmentally friendly but it has to start with people and a change in mindset in society.

(edit) And to further prove my point, here’s a notice I caught in NUS with regards to a seminar on golf courses.



4 Comments leave one →
  1. February 8, 2010 7:23 pm

    “A golf course is still development,” says Eric Antebi, national spokesperson for the Sierra Club. “It is not part of the natural landscape.” We agree. The natural landscape is a place under the control of natural forces and processes. Gulf courses always destroys the acres they sit on and they also impacts the acres they abuts for a distance of 1,000 feet (300 meters) in all directions.

    Checkout natural landscape.

  2. February 9, 2010 3:07 pm

    Sustainable golf courses are like sustainable coal plants. Rubbish! Especially when they clear forests and nature reserves in order to build them.. Sacrificing so much wild life for a small population of “rich elites” to hit a couple of white balls over hectares of land into small pot holes sound a bit much to me. Golf driving ranges are a lot more tolerable.

  3. February 28, 2010 6:52 pm

    Meadowbrook Golf Group Inc. is hit hard by economic times. It wasn’t that long ago the Operations VP Scott Beasley joined the company with a vision of transforming the company and taking it back to its glory days.

    Unfortunately, the odds have been stacked against him since. In 2005 the company was listed as one of the top 5 management companies in the US. In 2006, the company slipped to 8th and by June of 2009 the company was struggling to hold onto 20th place, as reported by The Golf Inc. Magazine. In 2007, Mr. Beasley place a hand picked a manager for the prestigious of Coo Saw Creak that later backfired with the GM being fired for theft. This combined with a $62,000 loss in operating income lead the BOD to hire PCA to assist with the transition from Meadowbrook Golf in the first quarter of 2009.

    Meadowbrook’s expected growth for 2010 is an ambitious 20% after appearing in Golf Course Industries Magazine as number 22 of the industries top 30. Unfortunately, on Feb 19th, as reported by the WSLS News Staff.

    “Roanoke City and Meadowbrook Golf Inc. say they will stop the operation and management of Countryside Golf Course on March 1st with both parties citing the down economy for the move.”

    These recent losses drop Meadowbrook’s standing to 26th and just 2 course closings away from a last place. If things do not turn around soon, the only courses they will be managing are the ones they have ownership in.

  4. April 20, 2010 1:58 am

    There is only one truly modern sustainable golf course….the new Hybrid golf course. It has been developed in a more practical compact design and addresses Time, Cost, Land-Usage, Course Maintenance, Safety & Environmental Issues. These new courses require minimal land-use of only 60-70 acres and are eco-friendly, perfect for restricted land applications such as in Singapore.
    A new hi-performance Hybrid golf ball has been developed, allowing the golfer a quicker, more affordable & enjoyable, “championship” round of golf.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: